Volume 13, Issue 1 / April-June 2001
Looking ahead to "Rio Plus 10," the UN begins to assess progress since
the Earth Summit
In an effort to assess the achievements and shortfalls worldwide in achieving
sustainable development, the United Nations will hold the World Summit on
Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, from 2-11 September
2002.
UNITED NATIONS - Of the major United Nations conferences in the 1990s, none
captured the world's imagination like the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Janeiro
in June 1992.
Among the first of such meetings to take place after the end of the cold
war, the Earth Summit showed how a wide range of actors, from UN agencies
to nation states to non-governmental organizations to associations of private
enterprise, could come together and set a bold, consensus-based agenda for
action on a major global concern - in this case, how to balance environmental
protection with development.
Nearly ten years later, however, many of the commitments made in Agenda
21, as the Earth Summit's ground-breaking action plan is known, remain unfulfilled.
In March, the United Nations released a series of reports on progress made
towards achieving the goals of Agenda 21. Those reports indicate progress
on many fronts. For instance, the public is more generally aware of environmental
issues, gains have been made in life expectancy and areas of health, and
there has been a decline in the world population growth rate.
In other areas, however, efforts to achieve sustainable development - the
goal of the Earth Summit - have fallen short.
The reports indicate, for example, that while the overall poverty rate worldwide
has declined, it has increased in some countries and the gap between rich
and poor has widened considerably; that energy use is up even though global
economic growth is down; that average development assistance from donor
countries has dropped as a percentage of their gross national product, instead
of rising as promised; that global warming remains a significant threat;
and that, as a result of continuing environmental problems like climate
change, deforestation and desertification, the number of endangered plant
and animal species continues to rise.
In an effort to assess more fully the achievements and shortfalls in the
field of environment and development, the United Nations will next year
hold the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). Designed as part
of the formal 10-year review process that the major UN conferences of the
1990s are undergoing, the Summit will be held in Johannesburg, South Africa,
2-11 September 2002.
At the meeting of the WSSD's first Preparatory Committee (PrepCom), held
at UN headquarters in New York, 30 April-2 May 2001, the general outline
of work leading up to the Johannesburg Summit was established - and some
of the key themes it will likely focus on began to emerge.
In outlining its program of work, the PrepCom established dates for future
preparatory meetings, adopted provisional rules of procedure for the Summit,
and set a preliminary agenda for high-level meetings in Johannesburg. It
also established arrangements for accreditation and participation of NGOs
and other major groups, such as businesses, which have all been encouraged
to become involved.
In terms of new themes, a number of issues began to emerge at the PrepCom,
including how sustainable development relates to globalization and the eradication
of poverty. In addition, there was much discussion about the necessity of
values and ethics in promoting sustainable development.
"The world does not look the same as it did when we met in Rio ten years
ago," said Nitin Desai, the UN's Under-Secretary General for Economic and
Social Affairs, addressing the PrepCom. "Changes have taken place, which
we cannot but take into account when we meet again at the Johannesburg Summit.
The most important of these is globalization.
"Globalization has resulted in the growing integration of economies, but
not just of economies, but also of many other areas of life, the impact
of which needs to be considered in Johannesburg. We need to look at the
impact of globalization on the possibility for sustainable development at
the local or national level and we need to look at the particular areas
that should be addressed," said Mr. Desai. "An important subset is the concern
about how we make the operations of large companies and transnational corporations
compatible with sustainable development."
Mr. Desai said another important issue that the WSSD is likely to address
is the relationship between sustainable development and "the emerging agenda
on poverty eradication."
"Much of the agenda on poverty eradication is people centered," said Mr.
Desai. "It focuses attention on services to be delivered to individuals.
What sustainable development can contribute to this agenda is a focus on
the resources dimension. An individual cannot be brought out of poverty
unless you address squarely the quality, the integrity, and the productivity
of the resources on which that individual's livelihood depends. This is
particularly true for the rural poor in the developing world, but is certainly
also important for addressing the concerns of the urban poor. Many of their
concerns are concerns that connect directly with the sustainable development
agenda."
Participants in the PrepCom indicated that the WSSD will also likely focus
on how better to bring sustainable development and Agenda 21 from theory
to practice.
Emil Salim, chairman of the PrepCom, took note of negative and positive
trends that the WSSD will need to address. Prof. Salim, a top diplomat from
Indonesia, said worldwide consumption continues to grow faster than the
"regeneration capacity" of renewable resources and major features of Agenda
21 have not been embraced as priorities.
On the positive side, he said, concepts and theories of sustainable development
have been advanced and have won wide backing among major groups in the private
sector and civil society.
"The bottom line, however, is the fact that the development that we have
pursued this far is not sustainable in any economic, social and environmental
sense," said Prof. Salim. He called on developing and developed countries
to work more closely to bring sustainable development into reality.
"The world is shrinking and interdependency is the driving force of development
today," he added. "It forces upon us the need to reinvigorate effective
implementation of sustainable development. The international community has
the skill, technology and capacity to improve the sustainable development
architecture.
"To develop this architecture, we need to join forces together, developed
and developing countries. Both countries are in the same Spaceship Earth
facing the challenge of moving along the chartered course of sustainable
development. The alternative to this is that we all together, developed
and developing countries, in this same Spaceship Earth, will crash in an
environmental catastrophe," said Prof. Salim.
The question of how to promote more widely the ethic of sustainable development
and the values needed to ensure its success emerged as another key theme
at the PrepCom.
"One of the most important outputs of the Rio conference was the Rio Declaration,"
said Halldor Thorgeisson, head of Iceland's delegation to the PrepCom, referring
to the overarching statement of principles issued by governments at the
Earth Summit. "It laid the conceptual and ethical framework for our work.
The World Summit could advance this conceptual and ethical framework even
further."
Mr. Thorgeisson suggested that among the ethical principles that might be
stressed is the "common responsibility" for all to promote "development
which meets real needs without causing environmental damage."
In a statement to the PrepCom, the Bahá'í International Community likewise
stressed the fundamental importance of ethics and values in achieving sustainable
development, and in particular urged the PrepCom to explore the importance
of spiritual values. The Community was one of five NGO statements read to
the plenary session on the opening day.
"[U]nless and until spiritual issues become central to the development process,
the establishment of a sustainable global civilization will prove impossible,"
said the statement, which was entitled "Sustainable Development: The Spiritual
Dimension."
"For the vast majority of the world's people the idea that human nature
is fundamentally spiritual is an incontrovertible truth. Indeed, this perception
of reality is the defining cultural experience for most of the world's people
and is inseparable from how they perceive themselves and the world around
them," the statement continued. "It is, therefore, only by bringing a focus
on the spiritual dimension of human reality that development policies and
programs can truly reflect the experiences, conditions and aspirations of
the planet's inhabitants and elicit their heartfelt support and active participation."
The Bahá'í statement also urged the PrepCom to look at the development of
interfaith relations and the expansion of interfaith initiatives as it searches
for new ways to motivate people to embrace sustainable development.
"Religious and spiritual traditions are increasingly coming together to
foster friendliness, fellowship and understanding among their diverse communities,"
the statement continued. "They are also increasingly working together on
policies, programs and initiatives with secular bodies ranging from private
enterprises and organizations of civil society, to governments and international
institutions. In such work, religious and spiritual value systems are viewed
not as separate from 'real world concerns,' but as vital sources of knowledge
and motivation, as wellsprings of values, insights, and energy without which
social cohesion and collective action are difficult, if not impossible,
to achieve."
"Ultimately, the creation of a peaceful and just global civilization, in
which the diverse peoples of the world live in harmony with one another
and with the natural world, will require a significant reorientation of
individual and collective goals and a profound transformation in attitudes
and behaviors," the statement concluded. "Such far-reaching changes will
come about only by addressing the non-material dimension of reality and
drawing on humanity's vast spiritual resources."
|